Joel Selwood injury, Geelong v Sydney Swans, Round 20 AFL

[ad_1]

GEELONG stays hopeful captain Joel Selwood can show his health for subsequent Saturday’s conflict with Richmond at Simonds Stadium after struggling an ankle damage within the 46-point loss to Sydney at Simonds Stadium.

On an evening during which the Cats’ top-two hopes took a dent, Selwood twice rolled his ankle earlier than sitting out the ultimate quarter of the match when the membership put him in cotton wool.

Cats coach Chris Scott stated Selwood had been taken from the sector when the sport was past doubt in an effort to extend his probabilities of enjoying towards the Tigers.

MATCH REPORT: CATS CAN’T ANSWER SWANS CHALLENGE

SWANS WIN: NO BUDDY, NO PROBLEM FOR SWANS

“They (the medical staff) are actually confident,” Scott stated. “I am actually confident enough to say now he will be fine.”

“Clearly in the last quarter (the question) was around whether we should keep pushing him through, making his chance of playing next week lower.”

Scott stated Sydney’s two-goal play at first of the final quarter crushed the Cats’ probabilities of staging a revival.

media_cameraJoel Selwood leads his workforce off after dropping to Sydney. Picture: Michael Klein

He stated from the imaginative and prescient he had seen, he didn’t agree with the umpire’s choice to pay Tom Papley with a second shot at objective after Dan Hannebery had kicked the primary one.

But he insisted Mitch Duncan had made a mistake in going again at Papley after there was a little bit of niggle between the 2 of them.

“I have looked at it, and (you can) have an opinion on these things,” Scott stated. “I feel that if the umpire that paid it has a take a look at the imaginative and prescient I’ve checked out, he shall be disenchanted that he paid it. That’s OK, errors occur.

“The extra correct query and the one we’re extra targeted on is why did Mitch do it within the first place.

AFL: Geelong’s Mitch Duncan punched Sydney’s Tom Papley, gifting away a shot for objective. Despite lacking, the Cats gave away a 50-metre penalty, making the objective a certainty.

Cat’s pricey mind snap

“(He) gave them cause to pay a free kick after which gave them a 50 when he missed the shot.

“Clearly we had an opportunity at quarter-time and we handed it to them … the errors have been made by our gamers. If there was a subsequent mistake by the umpires, their coaches will decide it up on Monday once they get to work.”

He anticipated Patrick Dangerfield, who resumes from his suspension subsequent week, to return again brisker following his week off.

“I hope so,” he stated. “That was obviously one of the things that we considered in making that decision (not to challenge). It is hard to say definitively, (but) I don’t think it will hurt him.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Chris Judd: Drawing the wrong conclusions

[ad_1]


Ben Pobjie

Columnist

“,
“adserver” : “https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?sz=640×360&iu=/34677533/Roar_video_400x300v&ciu_szs&impl=s&gdfp_req=1&env=vp&output=xml_vast2&unviewed_position_start=1&url=[referrer_url]&correlator=[timestamp]&cust_params=&cust_params=%26site%3Droar%26sport%3DAFL”
);

Chris Judd has all the time struck me as considered one of the extra clever and considerate of the footballing fraternity, however as the saying goes, even the world’s biggest genius can spout numerous brainless rubbish when there are column inches to fill.

Previously I had thought my very own profession was the greatest illustration of this adage, however there’s a new prime instance: Judd’s article of this week headed ‘Ban the draw: Why footy needs overtime and a shootout, during which the twin Brownlow medallist states his perception that permitting AFL video games to complete with scores degree is unacceptable and the established order have to be changed by a system making certain victory for one aspect.

There are fairly a couple of individuals who share Judd’s perception in fact, and I’m positive that as baffled as I’m by their insistence that pulls, which have been happening for so long as sport has existed, are one way or the other towards the spirit of the recreation, they’re equally baffled by individuals like me who insist that, truthfully, attracts are effective. Really.

They’re effective.

It’s arduous to persuade somebody who gnashes their tooth each time the siren blows with the scoreboard displaying fearful symmetry that it’s all okay and no one is being drained of their essence by letting the rating be.

You might level out that soccer’s been thriving for over a century now and that no one appears to have been turned off by the occasional draw. Of course some say that it’s totally different now – that sport is leisure and to compete in the leisure sector it wants to offer higher shopper satisfaction than a draw can present.

But sport has all the time been leisure, and the purpose it’s such nice leisure is that it’s not like different leisure.

The risk of disappointment, even of boredom, is important as a result of sport can’t correctly entertain until the individuals aren’t targeted in the beginning on leisure. What grips about sport is the contest, the battle, the determined struggling of two sides to emerge on prime. Without that, sport may as nicely simply be a film or a online game.

It stands aside as a result of once we watch sport we consider there’s something greater than crowd-pleasing happening. That’s why the AFL is 18 groups of various capacity enjoying one another on a rotating schedule quite than simply the similar two groups making an attempt to play as spectacularly as attainable each week.

Indeed it’s why there is a scoreboard – however once you’ve obtained a scoreboard there’s the risk it’ll find yourself tied. Removing that risk doesn’t play to the elementary attraction of sport; it’s an try and make sport much less sports-like – to make it neater, make it extra predictable, make it extra like leisure.

(Image: Greg Ford/AFL Media)

So what of Judd’s argument that a draw leads to “emptiness” for gamers and followers – that with out the decisiveness of a win and a loss everyone seems to be one way or the other robbed of a magical depth of feeling?

The brief model is: what a load of garbage. The longer model is: it’s simply not true. Judd writes of the Adelaide versus Collingwood recreation:

Sunday’s recreation between Collingwood and Adelaide was one in every of the video games of the yr however left supporters and gamers alike with neither the excessive of victory or the low of defeat. After such an epic battle, it doesn’t appear becoming that there was no victor …

It’s bizarre to assume that Judd might be a fan of soccer and nonetheless assume this. It could also be true that the emotions skilled by followers after that recreation weren’t precisely “the high of victory or the low of defeat”, however like virtually all attracts it was a story of 1 workforce that failed to hold on to a lead and one workforce that rose from the ashes to save lots of themselves from defeat.

In this specific occasion this was exaggerated by the reality a 50-point lead was blown. For the blower of an enormous lead there’s large disappointment whereas for the reeler-in there’s a sure sense of triumph. I assure you the gamers and followers of Adelaide and Collingwood weren’t brief on emotion at recreation’s finish.

As for “it doesn’t seem fitting that there was no victor”, that is the actual reverse of the case – actually after such an epic battle it wouldn’t have appeared becoming that one group needed to lose. Isn’t that what we all the time say, that it’s a disgrace there needed to be a loser?

So typically two groups each placed on a mighty efficiency and one has to go away with nothing to point out for his or her effort. On uncommon events they will’t be separated on the scoreboard, so why would we need to cast off these uncommon events when it’s so typically unattainable to separate them in our admiration?

As for Judd’s concern that a draw means no one will get the ‘energy’ from a win – properly, you had an opportunity to win, identical to each group that loses did. If you didn’t fairly take it, that’s sport for you – and I guess the power from a draw continues to be preferable to that from a loss.

Of course Judd doesn’t simply complain about attracts – he additionally offers a attainable answer. He doesn’t go for the concept of golden level, however like the progenitors of that foul NRL-blighting abomination, he has began with a nasty concept and tried his hardest to make it worse.

Judd proposes two three-minute durations of additional time, and if scores are nonetheless degree, a shootout. Yes! Having forged his eye over the recreation of soccer, Judd has determined that the AFL may benefit by adopting the worst a part of it and imposing it on video games that don’t want it.

But he proposes a ‘twist’ to differentiate it from soccer:

The uniqueness comes from the residence workforce selecting the place every set shot takes place from. If Adelaide have been the house workforce for example, they might have Eddie Betts decide a spot close to the boundary line utilising his unimaginable talent at banana kicks; if their opponent was capable of match Eddie’s effort, they might take their second set shot from 65 metres out utilizing Tex Walker’s booming proper foot to their benefit.

(Image: Lachlan Cunningham)

He has cleverly made positive that his concept isn’t the similar as soccer’s shootout: it’s a lot worse. The residence staff chooses the place every set shot takes place? What? What is the guideline right here? If the residence group has some type of superior ethical declare on victory, why not simply say that in the occasion of a draw, the residence group wins? Or play additional time the place the residence staff is the just one allowed to the touch the ball with their palms?

Are we making an attempt to show home-and-away soccer video games into slam-dunk contests? Most sports activities have the good sense to maintain their exhibitions and sideshows separate from their premier competitions; Judd would somewhat shoehorn one into the different.

Like golden level, which took the pointlessness of additional time and added predictability and unfairness into the combine, Judd’s concept is predicated on the premise that pulls are anathema to soccer lovers and any size ought to be taken to keep away from them.

But the premise is unfaithful: attracts are superb. They’re part of sport and they don’t detract from the pleasure and unpredictability of the contest – certainly they improve it.

Obviously attracts typically can’t be left to face. In finals and grand finals a victor is important, and additional time is preferable to placing on a replay the subsequent week (golden level and shootouts, nevertheless, are by no means crucial – a pox on them for all eternity).

But that is what’s termed ‘a necessary evil’ – we don’t play additional time in finals as a result of it’s enjoyable, we do it as a result of we have now to. For the remainder of the season, once we don’t need to, doing it’s simply silly.

I hope and pray that no one at the AFL reads Judd’s piece and feels a lightbulb go on, for as nice a participant as he was and as sensible a person as he’s, that is the dumbest concept floated for fairly a while.

For the love of God don’t repeat the NRL’s mistake. Don’t declare conflict on the draw. The draw is sweet. The draw is noble. The draw is a nice end result, and lengthy might it maintain delighting and irritating us in equal measure. For is that not sport?

[ad_2]

Source link

AFL Port Adelaide midfielder Ollie Wines draws battlelines before Showdown on AFL 360

[ad_1]

GROWING up in nation Victoria, Ollie Wines didn’t perceive the rivalry between Port Adelaide and Adelaide.

But since crossing the border and dwelling in a metropolis the place you determine as both Capulet or Montague, the 22-year-old advised nobody was resistant to the rivalry.

“Initially I didn’t understand that, but I’ve come to have that hatred,” Wines stated on Fox Footy’s AFL 360.

“We see one another down the streets and are clearly fairly pleasant.

“But when you cross that white line and doubtless generally if you see them play … you need to do higher than them.”

LISTEN TO THE ROUND 20 PREVIEW FOX FOOTY PODCAST BELOW, OR TAP HERE TO SUBSCRIBE IN ITUNES

media_cameraPort Adelaide gamers react to dropping the Showdown earlier this season. Photo: Sarah Reed

While Showdowns have traditionally defied type strains, Port Adelaide sits on the incorrect aspect of current historical past, having misplaced the previous 4 matches towards Adelaide.

In Round three, Adelaide triumphed by 17 factors.

“We want to win more games than them. And there’s two opportunities a year to take them on and do as much damage as you can,” Wines stated.

“We’re fairly hungry. We’ve misplaced 4 in a row and we don’t like letting our supporters down. We actually need to come out and spoil the celebration.

“Obviously there’s loads of animosity between the 2 golf equipment and it’s arduous to know in the event you’re not a stakeholder in one of many groups, both a supporter, participant or employees.”

Wines intimated the sport was necessary not only for bragging rights, however within the context of the season.

“It’s really important for both clubs,” he stated.

“Adelaide are trying to cement that number one spot on the ladder. We’re trying to get in that top four and hold our spot down. This is going to be one of the bigger ones in a while.”

Wines has loved his greatest season thus far at Port Adelaide, benefiting from the silver service of returning ruckman Paddy Ryder.

But it’s one other massive bodied midfielder in Sam Powell-Pepper who has caught the attention of not simply the competitors, however Wines.

media_cameraSam Powell-Pepper and Ollie Wines. Photo: Sarah Reed

“He’s been pretty special this year. He’s right up there in our opinion for the Rising Star,” Wines stated of Powell-Pepper.

“His capacity to hit the scoreboard and play by way of the center of the bottom and play a person’s position at such a younger age … I feel a number of guys, myself notably, dropped off at this stage.

“But he’s simply going on strongly. It’s thrilling to see him achieve this properly.”

Wines stated it was unusual to think about himself as a task mannequin for somebody who was solely three years his junior, however that he had ample help in that division.

“I’ve had to battle with that a little bit. At times I’ve thought, ‘how can I be that role model that I looked up to when I came into the system?’” Wines stated.

“I guess having the guys around me like Paddy Ryder, Brad Ebert, Robbie Gray and Travis Boak … I’m definitely not alone in leading this midfield.”

Want to be the Wildcard Entry to FOX FOOTY’s Longest Kick on Grand Final Day? Enter now!

Originally revealed as ‘I’ve come to have that hatred’: Battlelines drawn

[ad_2]

Source link

Greatest Players To Never Win An AFL Premiership

[ad_1]

Greatest Players To Never Win An AFL Premiership

by

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusmail

Nick Riewoldt introduced his retirement earlier this week and there have been loads of tributes paid to one of many modern-day greats.

Unless St Kilda are capable of do one thing particular over the subsequent two months, Riewoldt will end his profession with out an AFL premiership after going so shut on a lot of events together with his beloved Saints.

Riewoldt shouldn’t be the one AFL nice that completed his profession with no flag and he joins this beautiful listing of the Greatest Players To Never Win an AFL Premiership.

Nick Riewoldt – three Grand Finals (Including A Replay)

No man has taken extra marks within the historical past of the AFL/VFL than Nick Riewoldt and he has been a star for over a decade, however a premiership eluded him.

St Kilda have been narrowly crushed by Geelong within the 2009 Grand Final and everyone knows what occurred a yr later – St Kilda performed out a draw with Collingwood within the 2010 Grand Final earlier than they have been crushed within the replay every week later.

Gary Ablett – four Grand Finals

If there’s any man on this listing that deserved an AFL premiership it was Gary Ablett.

Ablett famously kicked Grand Final-record 9 objectives when Geelong misplaced to Hawthorn within the 1989 Grand Final, however it’s typically forgotten that he performed in three extra Grand Finals.

Geelong have been crushed by the West Coast Eagles in each 1992 and 1994 earlier than they went right down to Carlton in 1995.

Tony Lockett – 1 Grand Final

Tony Lockett is the very best goalkicker within the historical past of the VFL/AFL and the one full-forward to win the Brownlow Medal, however he by no means received to style premiership glory.

St Kilda didn’t have quite a lot of success in Lockett’s time on the membership, however he had an instantaneous impression at Sydney when he despatched the Swans into the 1996 Grand Final with a behind towards Essendon within the Preliminary Final.

Sydney went right down to North Melbourne within the Grand Final and they didn’t return till they beat West Coast in 2005.

Bob Skilton – zero Grand Finals

Bob Skilton is considered one of solely 4 gamers to have gained the Brownlow Medal 3 times, however he has famously stated that he would commerce all of them in for a single premiership.

South Melbourne had little or no success throughout Skilton’s time with the membership and the closest he got here to a Grand Final was in 1970 when the Bloods misplaced a semi-final to St Kilda.

Jim Stynes – 1 Grand Final

Jim Stynes’ profession is crammed to the brim of particular person achievements, however September success eluded Stynes and Melbourne.

Some Melbourne followers nonetheless blame Stynes for costing them a spot within the 1987 Grand Final when he ran throughout the mark simply earlier than the ultimate siren and he was their greatest on floor once they have been flogged by Hawthorn within the 1988 Grand Final.

Matthew Richardson – zero Grand Finals

It has been stated time and time once more, however Matthew Richardson definitely performed for Richmond throughout an unlucky period.

Richardson had a style of finals soccer in 2001 when Richmond have been crushed by the Brisbane Lions within the Preliminary Final, however sadly Richo by no means obtained the chance to play one other finals recreation.

Kevin Murray – zero Grand Finals

Kevin Murray is the best participant within the historical past of the Fitzroy Football Club nevertheless his time on the membership didn’t result in any nice success for the Lions.

Murray performed 333 video games for Fitzroy, however 208 have been losses and he holds the document for the very best variety of losses suffered by a person participant.

He performed in solely three finals throughout his complete profession and got here closest to creating a Grand Final look when Fitzroy suffered a slender defeat by the hands of Collingwood within the 1960 Preliminary Final.

Nathan Buckley – 2 Grand Finals

It ended up being pretty ironic that Nathan Buckley left the Brisbane Bears to hitch Collingwood to be able to win a Premiership…

Buckley led Collingwood to the 2002 Grand Final and he gained the Norm Smith Medal, however it was not sufficient to see the Magpies beat the Brisbane Lions and he misplaced to his previous membership as soon as once more in 2003.

Buckley was an assistant coach when Collingwood lastly gained one other flag in 2010.

Gary Dempsey – zero Grand Finals

No participant in historical past has polled extra Brownlow Medal votes than Gary Dempsey, however he by no means tasted quite a lot of group success throughout his time with Footscray and North Melbourne.

Footscray did not win a ultimate throughout Dempsey’s time on the membership and he missed out on a Grand Final look when Collingwood beat North Melbourne within the 1979 Preliminary Final.

Robert Harvey – 1 Grand Final

Robert Harvey performed 21 AFL seasons and polled a grand complete of 215 Brownlow Medal votes, however he solely performed within the one AFL Grand Final when St Kilda misplaced to the Adelaide Crows in 1997.

Cruelly, St Kilda performed in three Grand Finals within the two years immediately after Harvey retired and it’s truthful to say that they might have used his toughness and expertise of their Grand Final losses by the hands of Geelong and Collingwood.

[ad_2]

Source link

Memories from the legendary career of Nick Riewoldt

[ad_1]


Marty Gleason

Roar Pro

“,
“adserver” : “https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?sz=640×360&iu=/34677533/Roar_video_400x300v&ciu_szs&impl=s&gdfp_req=1&env=vp&output=xml_vast2&unviewed_position_start=1&url=[referrer_url]&correlator=[timestamp]&cust_params=&cust_params=%26site%3Droar%26sport%3DAFL”
);

Nick Riewoldt is retiring, however he might properly have needed to play on and couldn’t. It occurs right here and there in footy, the place the mind is stronger than the late-30s physique, however was that the case with Riewoldt?

Riewoldt has left fairly a number of reminiscences even for non-Saints followers like me, particularly throughout the Ross Lyon flip of the decade when the Saints introduced the press and squeezed their opponents into oblivion.

As an athletic, disciplined captain of St Kilda, he each personified the gritty fashion and had the talent that his teammates lacked to rise above it.

I’ve admired him and hated him. I definitely assume the recreation is dropping one thing with out him, greater than the loss of most different gamers.

I don’t consider we should always glorify the previous at the expense of the current, however I had hoped Riewoldt would proceed endlessly and ever. I needed him to defy time, and age, and in 2016 it appeared he was doing that.

He was persevering with to play helpful and typically impressed soccer lengthy after his mates had all fallen away, surrounded by a unique bunch of youngsters. While the world modified, Riewoldt was rising above the physics of the physique’s put on, and offering a dwelling hyperlink to occasions already forgotten, like the final Civil War veteran.

I see Riewoldt as the final of his sort, a Mr. St Kilda that’s not attainable in the free company age. Lenny Hayes and Brendan Goddard each performed a superhuman 2010 grand ultimate, and have been St Kilda for a day. But Goddard left and Hayes didn’t final so long as Riewoldt.

Riewoldt, as captain and a key ahead, was additionally the figurehead, the illustration of a membership in a means solely maybe seen with Wayne Carey and E.J. Whitten. You might have a dialog about the equally retiring Luke Hodge, however Hodge was surrounded by others like him so didn’t stand out as a lot.

Riewoldt’s pressured retirement goes again to complete questions on what’s a membership? This is just not on St Kilda, as a result of this phenomenon is common now – Brent Harvey ought to have performed till Kingdom Come.

But, if Riewoldt is expendable – and we requested ourselves this final yr with Sam Mitchell – then a membership is not about historical past, id, deep feelings and fraught love. A membership is only a revolving door of the subsequent expertise, who will come and probably in a number of years will depart. Riewoldt ought to have been an exception.

By default, the abiding reminiscences of St Kilda this century are from easily-obtained grand last DVD’s. Neither went Riewoldt’s approach.

The first grand remaining towards Geelong was a monsoonal, darkish day that induced the ball to slide by means of Riewoldt’s often positive grasp and annulled him, which given his superlative different two finals in 2009 towards Collingwood and the Bulldogs – virtually definitely value St Kilda the premiership.

Apart from the climate, St Kilda beat themselves, they blew it. The most you’ll be able to say about Geelong, extra a impartial entity that day, is that they a minimum of completed the higher.

With the Cats closing quick, an remoted St Kilda break at 67-65 noticed the Premiership wobble and topple on a Milne centre into the goalsquare and 43 years distilled into one second over whether or not Riewoldt’s palms might shut round a pigskin and maintain it. An eight-point lead on a fumbling day would have been St Kilda’s premiership. But Geelong’s defenders arrived and crashed his arms.

Riewoldt talked about throwing his soiled boots in the nook of his house in dejection that night time and instantly leaving Australia to get all of it out of his head. Then he got here house, noticed the boots in the very same place, and all of it got here flooding again.

A yr later was a kind of redemption for staff and participant, regardless that St Kilda weren’t capable of win. St Kilda, on Hayes’ and Goddard’s again, wrung each potential ounce of their restricted potential to arrange a six-point lead towards a far superior staff in Collingwood.

This time, the solar was ablaze and in contrast to the rain of 09, it was St Kilda’s personal enjoying fashion that for the second time turned the grand ultimate right into a fumbling, congested scrap.

Riewoldt wasn’t big on this recreation both, however was inspirational right here and there. Was it solely coincidence that of the 36 gamers camped round the ball, it was he who picked up the ball and despatched it tumbling miraculously in the direction of objective, the place the final bounce once more deceived St Kilda and Maxwell smothered on the line? Or was it greatness?

St Kilda captain Nick Riewoldt leads his players from the field

(Lachlan Cunningham)

There have been two minutes left and Collingwood’s vaunted full-ground press have been defending a one-point lead. How might St Kilda get the ball down? Riewoldt. He flew throughout the pack and took an unimaginable mark. He booted it, Hayes booted it, Milne missed it and the recreation was tied.

All Western Bulldogs supporters like myself are filthy about the 2009 St Kilda-Bulldogs preliminary ultimate, however the 2016 Premiership is of course, a balm for us that Riewoldt will sadly by no means obtain as a participant.

The Bulldogs sweated a 4 objectives to 3 halftime lead towards one of the single biggest one-year groups in AFL historical past. An whole half of gut-busting effort was all worn out by an umpire who watched Brian Lake carry out the typical pre-bounce bumping and gave Riewoldt a free kick for it in entrance of aim, and not using a third-quarter bounce.

I’m unsure whether or not in charge Riewoldt for the injustice or not. He went down simply sufficient. Then at the finish he rubbed it in with the two final, match-winning objectives with St Kilda’s nearly solely two assaults of the final quarter. I’m choking alone bile, as The Simpsons would say.

A couple of years later I noticed Riewoldt stand over one of our fallen defenders, lording it over him with the Bulldogs down and out as a group in 2012, and I momentarily hated his guts. He had a gamesmanship in him that was once more revealed solely a month in the past when he faked the 50-metre penalty that gained the recreation towards Fremantle.

I keep in mind Nick Riewoldt as a younger man, enjoyable and good and emotional. I keep in mind watching The Footy Show they usually requested him what type of duties have been concerned with being an AFL footballer. “Make my bed, clean my room,” he replied, laughing.

During Round 1, 2005, the dying juggernaut of Brisbane had one final hurrah, defeating the superior Saints whereas Mal Michael and the Scotts repeatedly bumped him off the ball on his injured shoulder. Riewoldt was sitting on the bench after that and in tears.

Men drink and struggle! But today there are moments and articles about AFL footballers crying all the time. Maybe Riewoldt was the one who started to make it a suitable follow for males.

There was a way that night time that it was a setback, however that St Kilda and Riewoldt have been nonetheless at the starting of a journey and issues have been optimistic.

Twelve years later, that journey is now over.

[ad_2]

Source link

Star trio to return for Crows ahead of the Showdown

[ad_1]

“,
“adserver” : “https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?sz=640×360&iu=/34677533/Roar_video_400x300v&ciu_szs&impl=s&gdfp_req=1&env=vp&output=xml_vast2&unviewed_position_start=1&url=[referrer_url]&correlator=[timestamp]&cust_params=&cust_params=%26site%3Droar%26sport%3DAFL”
);

AFL flag favourites Adelaide might welcome again three key stars for a highly-anticipated Showdown with Port Adelaide.

The Crows sit 4 factors clear on prime of the ladder after enjoying out the unlikeliest of attracts towards Collingwood at the MCG on Sunday.

Down by 50 factors early in the third quarter, Adelaide conjured up an astonishing comeback, with Mitch McGovern’s aim after the siren – his fourth for the recreation – sealing a 15.13 (103) to 16.7 (103) outcome.

The Crows have a troublesome run ahead with Sunday’s conflict towards fifth-placed Port adopted by video games towards Essendon at Etihad Stadium, Sydney and West Coast in Perth.

Star ahead Eddie Betts, prime mover Brad Crouch and key defender Jake Lever might all make a well timed return from accidents for the recreation towards the Power.

Lever, who’s off-contract at season’s finish and certain to appeal to huge presents from a quantity of rival golf equipment, has been sidelined for the previous fortnight with a hamstring pressure.

Betts missed the recreation towards Collingwood after having his appendix eliminated, whereas Crouch suffered a fractured cheekbone throughout final week’s win over Geelong.

“The prognosis on all those guys is pretty positive,” Pyke stated.

“They ought to all be out there at this level. We’re optimistic on all three.

“They’re nice video games, they all the time have been, and the place the two sides are positioned on the ladder in all probability provides just a little bit additional to it.

“The importance of wins at this time of the year, in terms of ladder position and finishes, is real so it’s a great opportunity.”

[ad_2]

Source link

Patrick Dangerfield tackle: Geelong may launch appeal against MRP ban

[ad_1]

GEELONG may launch an all-or-nothing appeal against the shock ban that has knocked Patrick Dangerfield out of rivalry for a consecutive Brownlow Medal.

The Cats celebrity was yesterday charged with tough conduct and hit with a two-match suspension — lowered to at least one week with a responsible plea — for his heavy deal with that left Carlton ruck Matthew Kreuzer concussed.

Dangerfield faces a two-week stint on the sidelines ought to he elect to appeal at tonight’s AFL tribunal and fail.

The Cats have till 11am right now to determine whether or not to roll the cube.

MARK ROBINSON: THE MRP’S DECISION ON DANGER’S TACKLE IS WRONG

JAY CLARK: DANGER ON WRONG SIDE OF LINE

Dangerfield conceded the state of affairs “is not ideal”. “At the end of the day, we’ll make a decision that’s best for the team — not the individual — and what’s best for the rest of our season,” he stated.

As quickly because the penalty was introduced, Richmond star Dustin Martin became the raging favourite to win the Brownlow.

Geelong has engaged a Queen’s Counsel to evaluate the probability of an appeal succeeding.

Former Cats captain Andrew Bews, who’s father of Geelong participant Jed, lashed the choice.

“Congratulations to the @AFL nanny state comp of the year,” he wrote on Twitter.

“MRP a complete farce.”

In difficult, Dangerfield would danger a fortnight suspension that may see him sidelined not just for this Friday night time’s conflict with Sydney, however the group’s Round 21 blockbuster against Richmond.

AFL: Patrick Dangerfield might discover himself in scorching water.

Danger sling stuns Kreuzer

‘FAIR TACKLE’: DANGER ON THE INCIDENT

BROWNLOW: IT’S DUSTY’S TO LOSE

Opinion amongst followers was divided with, as of 11.20pm final night time, 53 per cent within the Herald Sun’s ballot saying the penalty was deserved. Before the weekend, the Cat was $1.80 favorite to go back-to-back within the Brownlow Medal.

After yesterday’s determination, Richmond ace Dustin Martin turned scorching favorite to take out this yr’s award — which Dangerfield should current — rated a $1.18 probability with TAB, in from $2.25.

media_cameraPatrick Dangerfield appeared to right away appeal for a free kick, considering he had caught Matthew Kreuzer holding the ball. Picture: AAP

But Dangerfield was agency that the Brownlow Medal ramifications would haven’t any bearing on whether or not he would appeal against the ban.

“It’s the last thing on my mind,” he stated.

“What we’re focused on is not only this week, but the remainder of the season and putting ourselves in a really strong position come the end of the year and come the start of the finals campaign. That’s an important part of the decision that’s to be made.”

JON RALPH: TIME TO DITCH ‘ARCHAIC’ BROWNLOW SYSTEM

media_cameraCarlton’s Matthew Kreuzer was concussed when he was tackled by Patrick Dangerfield. Picture: Michael Klein

Kreuzer was concussed within the incident and performed no additional half in Saturday night time’s recreation after the deal with, by which his arms have been pinned and he was delivered to floor.

A medical report from the Blues was thought-about yesterday by the Match Review Panel — comprised of former gamers Jason Johnson, Nathan Burke and Michael Jamison.

The cost is Dangerfield’s second in 196 video games — he was fined $900 in 2012 for making negligent contact with an umpire.

lauren.wood@news.com.au

Originally revealed as Geelong plots high-stakes Danger appeal

[ad_2]

Source link

The dog days of the AFL season are here and to be savoured

[ad_1]


Jay Croucher

Columnist

“,
“adserver” : “https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/ads?sz=640×360&iu=/34677533/Roar_video_400x300v&ciu_szs&impl=s&gdfp_req=1&env=vp&output=xml_vast2&unviewed_position_start=1&url=[referrer_url]&correlator=[timestamp]&cust_params=&cust_params=%26site%3Droar%26sport%3DAFL”
);

With the scoreboard studying 37-90, Marc Murphy lined up for objective after the three quarter time siren from the proper boundary, and you bought the sense that even he knew his kick was completely meaningless.

Murphy’s reference to the ball was bitter, and it missed proper, fluttering innocuously to the floor, one thing that the recreation had already carried out a lot earlier.

‘Carlton versus Geelong, Round 19, 2017′ will only be one for the history books in the sense that it did actually take place in the world. The lone upshot from the game is that a certain player probably won’t get a one-week suspension.

It wasn’t a well-played recreation, and it wasn’t an particularly poorly performed recreation. It was only a ‘played’ recreation. Geelong have been clear, and cleanliness is all you actually need to win Round 19 video games towards groups with 5 wins.

The Blues, who for a lot of the previous three months have excelled at not capturing themselves in the foot, lastly received the shotgun out and pointed it downwards. Levi Casboult dropped uncontested marks, Zac Fisher lofted 20-metre passes to opponents, and Bryce Gibbs seemed misplaced wherever he went.

It was the sort of recreation the place gamers have the ball inside 50 with lots of time and then determine to chip a brief move sideways to a contest.

And via all of it, the Blues tried. Sam Docherty marched out of defence, proud, upright and with the phantasm of objective, and Dale Thomas jumped up and down on the mark like a madman, partying prefer it was 2011.

It was someplace on the spectrum between pathetic and admirable, principally veering (sympathetically) to the former. Carlton’s defence, incomprehensibly strong for therefore lengthy, has turn into extra comprehensively woeful the previous fortnight. Whether different groups have found out their construction, or the Carlton gamers have found out that there’s solely a month left in the season, is tough to know.

The Blues have performed like they’re ready for an ending, and this recreation performed out as if each groups have been ready for the siren. Patrick Dangerfield’s laconic final quarter snap, hit with the depth of a drained youngster taking a shot for objective on an empty suburban oval with nobody watching on a January afternoon, stated all of it.

Patrick Dangerfield Geelong Cats AFL 2016

(AAP Image/Julian Smith)

Much of the season’s final 4 rounds will play out as this recreation did, and as Richmond versus Gold Coast and West Coast versus Brisbane did. The group whose thoughts is elsewhere will give a quick impassioned yell, however then the group whose yr continues to be alive will shortly quiet them, and they’ll keep quiet. The individuals in the crowd watching will be the quietest ones of all.

This isn’t an issue that has to be eradicated by a revolutionary fixture. Meaninglessness doesn’t have to be unenjoyable. There are moments in each match – an effortlessly clean operating banana aim from Harry McKay, an immaculately struck set shot from Jack Silvagni – that justify the worth of admission.

The actual worth of these video games, although, these dog days, is the helplessness, nevertheless it’s a sense that may be saved as context, a context that makes the significant moments in the future all the extra rewarding.

Sport wants stability to be at its most magical. The 2016 grand last was made extra particular by the undeniable fact that the 2015 grand last was not particular. While you’re sitting at residence alone on a Saturday night time in a quiet room, the hum of the fridge someway louder than normal, watching Matthew Wright pinpoint opposition gamers, it will possibly be straightforward to lose perspective.

But Matthew Wright in late July is the payment that one has to pay for Marcus Bontempelli in late September, a payment that makes the latter a lot sweeter as a result of, irrationally or not, it makes Bontempelli really feel a lot extra earned.

So don’t take away our ache, Gillon McLachlan. Let us have Geelong 123, Carlton 58. Because even when we don’t need it, we’d simply want it.

[ad_2]

Source link

Patrick Dangerfield tackle on Matthew Kreuzer: Brownlow Medal wait

[ad_1]

PATRICK Dangerfield has defended his tackle on Matthew Kreuzer saying he “didn’t think there was much in it” amid widespread debate as as to if it is going to finish his bid for a second Brownlow Medal.

Dangerfield pinned Kreuzer’s arms and dumped the ruckman head first into the Etihad Stadium turf with a sling tackle within the third quarter of Geelong’s 18.15 (123) to eight.10 (58) victory.

Kreuzer was ushered to the Carlton rooms and wasn’t seen for the remainder of the match.

Geelong coach Chris Scott says the very fact Kreuzer was concussed shouldn’t finish Dangerfield’s push for a second straight Brownlow Medal.

Speaking on Game Day, Dangerfield appeared assured there will probably be no difficulty with the MRP.

“I haven’t been cited for anything. In my opinion I was just tackling I felt it was a fair tackle,” he stated.

“I rolled the tackle so I wouldn’t give away a free kick for within the again. I assumed that he nonetheless had the ball and that’s the reason I rotated and put my arms within the air.

“There was no umpire’s name on the time. So I don’t see a problem with it however it isn’t as much as me.

“I didn’t realize it was a problem till I walked off the bottom. Obviously (I used to be requested by) media on the floor then I used to be briefed on it and stated ‘I don’t know what you’re speaking about?’.

“Then they performed me imaginative and prescient. I don’t see a problem with it in any respect.

“It wasn’t paid a free kick in any respect. Like I stated, we should wait to see the way it performs out.”

The smiling seven who inspire Danger

MATCH REPORT: NO SWEAT AS CATS PUMMEL BLUES

A clamp down on harmful tackles in current occasions value Docker Cam McCarthy a two-week suspension for driving St Kilda’s Sam Gilbert into the turf and Dangerfield’s effort drew comparable comparisons.

Dangerfield pinned Kreuzer’s arms and “went on with” his tackle after the ball departed and the pair careered in to the bottom.

While it appeared Kruezer’s shoulder might have hit the bottom first, his head additionally made contact.

The Blues massive man bounced again up within the first occasion and didn’t lose consciousness.

But he was despatched from the bottom for a concussion check, and didn’t return to the sector.

WATCH THE INCIDENT IN THE PLAYER ABOVE AND HAVE YOUR SAY

Carlton confirmed Kreuzer had suffered a “mild concussion” however Scott, who had watched the incident, stated that alone shouldn’t be the nail in Dangerfield’s Brownlow coffin.

“For what it’s worth, what I saw, was him (Dangerfield) make a tackle, he was unaware if the ball had spilled out, so he tried to take the player to ground and roll him in the tackle to avoid the in the back free kick, which is exactly the way we coach it,” Scott stated.

“It wasn’t a sling, that’s for positive. I don’t assume he intentionally drove him in to the bottom. On that foundation and what we now have seen the final couple of years, I might anticipate that he can be high-quality.

“When a participant is harm, and goes off the bottom, there’s an additional dimension there that draws scrutiny.

media_cameraPatrick Dangerfield will face scrutiny for his tackle on Matthew Kreuzer. Picture: AAP

“But I feel the powers that be have been very clear that the severity of any damage solely is available in to play whenever you acknowledge that there was a breach of the principles. And I simply don’t see that once I watch it.

“It’s not concerning the finish end result, it’s concerning the motion, and whether or not the tackle was justifiable within the circumstances. He had the ball, tried to show him within the tackle and roll him … when you acknowledge these issues, the ramifications or the seriousness of the damage are moot.”

Carlton coach Brendan Bolton stated he had not seen the incident in sufficient element to make a name, and stated Kruezer got here from the bottom consistent with the membership’s coverage on ensuring gamers are “really well protected”.

He didn’t come again on the bottom and Kreuz is an absolute workhorse,” Bolton stated.

“I consider him a player that gets on the front foot and can push through adversity but he didn’t come back but … we make sure that our players are really well protected in terms of welfare and anything related to the head our doctors will make really good informed decisions on so in this instance we looked after him.”

media_cameraMatthew Kreuzer heads to the bench after Dangerfield’s tackle. Picture: Michael Klein

Scott paid tribute to his gamers for a “professional” effort within the complete victory which might but come at a double-cost after Nakia Cockatoo seemed to have re-injured his hamstring.

But Scott was very happy with the return to type of star ahead Tom Hawkins who kicked six objectives in a “dominant performance” boosting the cats forward of what looms as an enormous conflict with Sydney subsequent Friday night time.

Bolton, in the meantime, dismissed speak of the younger Blues feeling the consequences of an extended season, assured creating gamers would solely profit from higher publicity towards top-line opposition.

“I think what you’re seeing really is a club that’s in contention versus a club that’s in its second year of a reset and on a different path just right now,” Bolton stated.

“They stretched us in defence and we couldn’t get any delay on the ball and with none delay on the ball you look even slower in all probability.

“I feel Geelong a few of their unfold and their capacity to take the ball to the surface with uncontested possession … I obtained to offer them credit score, they will make you look a bit of bit (drained).”

Bolton final singled out Sam Petrevski-Seton as somebody who would profit from spending extra time within the midfield with Patrick Cripps (leg) and Ed Curnow (throat) sidelined with accidents.

— with Gilbert Gardiner

Originally revealed as Danger: Brownlow fate is out of my hands

[ad_2]

Source link